ArticlePharmacotherapy2025
Risk of acute kidney injury in dapagliflozin users with type 2 diabetes: A nationwide propensity score-matched cohort study in Korea.
Article in Pharmacotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk of acute kidney injury in dapagliflozin users with type 2 diabetes: A nationwide propensity score-matched cohort study in Korea.Pharmacotherapy · 2025Article
- Early Dapagliflozin in Non-diabetic Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Post-PCI: Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Left Ventricular Remodeling (EARLY DAPA-AMI).Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeveral previous studies have identified a potential risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, based on adverse event reports. However, recent European observational studies have shown conflicting results.
objectiveTo evaluate the risk of AKI in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) who were treated with dapagliflozin compared with sitagliptin.
methodWe conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients with T2DM who were newly prescribed dapagliflozin or sitagliptin between September 1, 2014, and June 30, 2021, using the nationwide National Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) Service database in Korea. Propensity scores were estimated using a multivariable logistic regression model, and matching was performed at a 1:1 ratio to balance the dapagliflozin and sitagliptin groups. The outcome of interest was the occurrence of AKI hospitalization 90 days post-exposure, captured by a validated algorithm based on the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) code: N17. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards model.
resultsAmong 94,977 dapagliflozin users matched to sitagliptin users, AKI events occurred in 132 dapagliflozin users versus 198 sitagliptin users, with incidence rates of 2.92 and 8.93 per 1000 person-years, respectively. The risk of AKI events was 34% lower in dapagliflozin users (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.53-0.83) compared with sitagliptin users. This protective effect remained consistent in sensitivity analyses.
conclusionContrary to the United States Food and Drug Administration's safety warning, our findings suggest that dapagliflozin may have a protective effect against AKI in patients with T2DM. This is consistent with recent findings from European post-marketing safety studies and may serve as supportive evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.