ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence applications in cardiovascular imaging: trends, impact, and emerging research areas.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- PRIME 2.0: Proposed Requirements for Cardiovascular Imaging-Related Multimodal-AI Evaluation: An Updated Checklist.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2026Guideline
- Exploring the landscape of artificial intelligence in dental and maxillofacial radiology: a bibliometric analysis of studies and trends.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven diabetic retinopathy research: mapping the evolution, coupling, and global collaboration landscape (1996-2026).Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: Current Landscape, Clinical Impact, and Future Directions.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in cardiac imaging has rapidly evolved, offering enhanced accuracy and efficiency in the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular diseases. This bibliometric study aimed to evaluate research trends, impact, and scholarly output in this expanding field. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on 14 August 2024 using the Web of Science Core Collection database. VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and Biblioshiny were utilized for data analysis. Results: The findings revealed a significant increase in publications on AI in cardiovascular imaging, particularly from 2018 to 2023, with the United States leading in research output. England and the United States have emerged as central hubs in the global research network, highlighting their role in generating high-quality and impactful publications. The University of London was identified as the top contributing institution, while Conclusion: Healthcare providers should consider integrating AI tools into cardiovascular imaging practice, as AI has demonstrated the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve patient outcomes. This study highlights the rising importance of AI in personalized and predictive cardiovascular care, urging healthcare providers to stay informed about these advancements to enhance clinical decision-making and patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.