ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025
Anaesthetic emergence agitation in adults following general surgery: A scoping review.
Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of dexmedetomidine on emergence agitation and pain in post-anesthesia recovery of patients undergoing upper limb elective orthopedic surgery: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Impact of preoperative audiovisual distraction on emergence agitation in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded pilot study.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anaesthetic emergence is the patient's transition from general anaesthetic until they are alert and in full control of vital reflexes. It is during this transition that significant complications, including anaesthetic emergence agitation, may occur. A preliminary search did not identify any research investigating adults who undergo anaesthetic emergence in critical care settings. Objectives: To map the post-anaesthetic literature reporting outcomes, risk factors, and management of adult patients admitted directly to a critical care unit, who develop emergence agitation, and to describe the implications for clinical practice. Methods: The scoping review was registered at https://osf.io/spwx5/ and conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, with the framework of Population, Concept and Context. Search terms including agitation, anaesthetic, emergence, postoperative and surgery. Results: Twenty-five articles were identified and were eligible for data extraction. Risk factors included co-morbid conditions, anaesthetic agents and the presence of in-situ invasive devices. Studies varied regarding design and patient assessment tools. Data were reported from one or more of eight observation timepoints along the emergence continuum, from end-anaesthetic until post anaesthetic care unit discharge. No studies investigated patients with direct postoperative admission to critical care settings. Conclusions: This review has characterised the emergence continuum. The variations between studies has highlighted the necessity to reach future consensus regarding emergence definition and measurement. A critical gap was identified regarding recommendations for prevention and management of emergence agitation for patients admitted directly to a critical care unit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.