ArticleJVS-vascular science2025
Analysis of the relationship between central adiposity and biomechanical, histological, and immunohistochemical properties of the anterior wall of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Article in JVS-vascular science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toward the "slope of enlightenment": The role of adiposity in abdominal aortic aneurysms.JVS-vascular science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Adipose tissue plays a role in atherogenesis and degeneration of the vascular wall. However, the relationship between aortic abdominal aneurysm (AAA) and adipose tissue is controversial. This study aimed to correlate the biomechanical properties (elasticity and resistance), histology and immunohistochemistry findings of aortic tissue fragments from abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with the abdominal fat distribution determined by computed tomography scans. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from biomechanical tests performed on fragments of the anterior wall of AAA obtained during open surgical repair. A uniaxial test was used to determine the tissue's failure tensile strength, tension, stress, and elasticity (strain). Preoperative computed tomography scans were used to quantify abdominal circumference at the L3-L4 and umbilical levels. Visceral and subcutaneous fat areas were quantified at these levels using tissue radiodensity. Univariate analysis and multiple regression models were used to correlate adiposity measures with biomechanical variables, considering factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and smoking status. Histological analysis (hematoxylin and eosin staining) was performed on twenty-five specimens, and immunohistochemical analysis (CD20, CD68, CD45, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ [PPAR-γ], KLF5, and tumor necrosis factor-α) was performed on 13 specimens. Results: The most common risk factors were hypertension (82%) and smoking (85%). Diabetes mellitus was present in 21.8%. No correlation was found between visceral fat area and biomechanical parameters or maximum AAA diameter. Predominance of visceral adipose tissue at L3-L4 and the umbilical level was associated with lower fibrosis in all layers of the abdominal wall (subcutaneous, 61% vs visceral, 41%), higher PPAR-γ expression in the tunica media (subcutaneous, 170.5-199.0 positive cells/mm Conclusions: No relationship was found between the biomechanical parameters of the AAA wall and visceral or subcutaneous fat areas. The predominance of visceral fat was associated with increased adipocyte cellularity and decreased elastic fiber concentration in the tunica media of the anterior AAA wall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.