Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40213678›Full record

SynthesisTheranostics2025

Therapeutic potential of FAPI RLT in oncology: A systematic review.

Saad Ruzzeh, Ahmed Saad Abdlkadir, Diana Paez, Keon W Kang, Tadashi Watabe, Serin Moghrabi, Andrew M Scott, Akram Al-Ibraheem

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Theranostics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observation on Discordant Treatment Response on [World journal of nuclear medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. The superiority of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  12. Combined antitumor activity of [EJNMMI research · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Diagnostic Efficacy of FAPI-PET/CT Versus [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Future of radiotheranostics.BMJ oncology · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saad RuzzehDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Amman, 11941, Jordan.
Ahmed Saad AbdlkadirDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Amman, 11941, Jordan.
Diana PaezNuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Keon W KangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tadashi WatabeDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Serin MoghrabiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Amman, 11941, Jordan.
Andrew M ScottDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, 3084 Heidelberg, Australia.
Akram Al-IbraheemDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Amman, 11941, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Membrane ProteinsNeoplasmsRadiopharmaceuticalsEndopeptidasesFibroblast Activation Protein AlphaHumansTreatment OutcomeEndopeptidasesFibroblast Activation Protein AlphaMembrane ProteinsRadiopharmaceuticals[177Lu]Lu-FAPI[90Y]Y-FAPIFAPI RLTFibroblast activation protein inhibitorRadionuclide therapySystematic review.

Identifiers

PMID40213678
PMCPMC11980674

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.