Evidence mapPaperPMID 40213719Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Diabetes Mellitus and Cognitive Decline: A Systematic Review Exploring the Link to Dementia and Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Abdul Saboor Khaliq, Aroon Kumar, Mahnoor Khan, Zarin Nudar Rodoshi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdul Saboor KhaliqInternal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, PAK.
Aroon KumarMedicine and Surgery, Khairpur Medical College, Khairpur, PAK.
Mahnoor KhanMedicine and Surgery, Fazaia Medical College, Islamabad, PAK.
Zarin Nudar RodoshiMedical Education, Mymensingh Medical College, Dhaka, BGD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review explores the association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and cognitive decline, with a particular focus on neurodegenerative diseases such as dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD). A comprehensive search strategy, conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, identified and selected nine meta-analyses of high relevance and methodological rigor. These studies encompassed diverse populations, including stroke survivors, apolipoprotein E (APOE) ɛ4 carriers, and individuals with metabolic syndrome, and examined both interventions, such as glucose-lowering therapies, and risk factors, including hypoglycemia and poor glycemic control. Key findings indicate that diabetes is a significant risk factor for cognitive decline, with strong associations observed between impaired glucose metabolism and elevated tau biomarkers. Glucose-lowering therapies, particularly sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and metformin, demonstrated potential neuroprotective effects, reducing the risk of dementia and cognitive impairment. However, heterogeneity among the studies and variability in study designs highlight the need for further high-quality research to validate these findings and elucidate underlying mechanisms. This review underscores the importance of integrating cognitive health into diabetes management and highlights the potential of targeted interventions to mitigate the cognitive burden associated with diabetes.

Indexed as

alzheimer’s diseasecognitive declinedementiadiabetes mellitusglucose-lowering therapiesmeta-analysissystematic reviewtau biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID40213719
PMCPMC11984794

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.