Evidence mapPaperPMID 40214296Full record

Trial reportJournal of diabetes2025

Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide Biosimilar LY05008 Versus the Reference Product Dulaglutide (Trulicity) in Chinese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, Open-Label, Active Comparator Study.

Li Liu, Zhifeng Cheng, Lianwei Wang, Lili Zhang, Shunbin Li, Shu Li, Shuguang Pang, Qifu Li, Fang Bian, Junling Gu and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Li LiuBeijing Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhifeng ChengThe Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Lianwei WangZhumadian Central Hospital, Zhumadia, Henan, China.
Lili ZhangJincheng Hospital, Jinchen, Shanxi, China.
Shunbin LiHuzhou Central Hospital, Zhejiang, China.
Shu LiHuizhou Central Hospital, Huizhou, Guangdong, China.
Shuguang PangJinan Central Hospital, Jinan City, Shandong, China.
Qifu LiThe First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7249-6445
Fang BianPeople's Hospital of Cangzhou, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.
Junling GuSecond People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin, Sichuan, China.
Jie ShenShunde Hospital of Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Liujun FuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan, China.
Baiping SunShandong Boan Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Yantai, China.
Yanyan ZhaoShandong Boan Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Yantai, China.
Changlin DouShandong Boan Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Yantai, China.
Zhaoyang ZengYichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, Hubei, China.
Lixin GuoBeijing Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6863-1798

Funding

Shandong Boan Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Yantai, China
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDulaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, has been approved for improving glycemic control and reducing the risk of cardiovascular (CV) adverse events. A previous result in healthy Chinese male subjects demonstrated the pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity of LY05008 and the licensed product dulaglutide, with comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles. A well-controlled phase 3 study with an adequate sample size was subsequently conducted for safety and efficacy evaluation.

methodsIn a multicenter, randomized, open-label, active comparator phase 3 study, Chinese adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a subcutaneous injection of 1.5 mg LY05008 or dulaglutide once weekly for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the mean change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 24. The secondary endpoints included the mean change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 12; the proportion of patients who had achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% at Weeks 12 and 24; and the mean change in body weight, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level, and 2-h postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) level from baseline to Weeks 12 and 24. Safety, PK, and immunogenicity profiles were also included for data analysis.

resultsA total of 440 patients were randomized to receive LY05008 (n = 222) or dulaglutide (n = 218). The mean changes in HbA1c from baseline to Week 24 in the LY05008 group and dulaglutide group were -1.44% and -1.41%, respectively, with a least square mean difference (LSMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.06% (-0.08, 0.19) (p > 0.05). Efficacy equivalence could be demonstrated since the 95% CI between the reference drug and a biosimilar fell entirely within the range of (-0.4%, 0.4%). The mean changes in HbA1c from baseline to Week 12 in the LY05008 group and dulaglutide group were -1.47% and -1.39% (p > 0.05), respectively. At Week 12, 40.1% of patients who received LY05008 and 42.2% of those who received dulaglutide had a decrease in the HbA1c level to 6.5% or less, and 60.4% and 60.6% of patients in the LY05008 group and the dulaglutide group had a decrease in the HbA1C level < 7%, respectively. At Week 24, 41.0% and 43.6% of patients achieved an HbA1c ≤ 6.5%. 55.9% and 66.5% of patients in the LY05008 group and the dulaglutide group achieved the HbA1c goal of < 7%, respectively. The mean changes in body weight from baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in the LY05008 group and dulaglutide group were -2.01 and -1.71 kg (p > 0.05) and -2.68 and -2.42 kg (p > 0.05), respectively. The mean changes in FPG level from baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in the LY05008 group and dulaglutide group were -2.578 and -2.681 mmol/L (p > 0.05) and -2.222 and -2.690 mmol/L, respectively. In the LY05008 group and the dulaglutide group, the mean changes in 2-h PPG levels from baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 were -4.364 and -4.800 mmol/L(p > 0.05) and-3.502 and -4.217 mmol/L (p > 0.05), respectively. The common treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the LY05008 and dulaglutide groups were decreased appetite, diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infection, hyperuricemia, nausea, urinary tract infection, and vomiting. Most TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of TEAEs. Hypoglycemic events were noted in 0.9% of patients who had received LY05008 and in 3.7% of those who had received dulaglutide. Serious adverse events were reported in 4.1% of patients in the LY05008 group and in 3.7% of patients in the dulaglutide group. The PK parameter C

conclusionThe primary endpoint was met in this study through the demonstration of equivalent efficacy in HbA1c reduction in Chinese adults with T2DM between LY05008 and dulaglutide. Overall, the biosimilar product LY05008 showed comparable safety, PK, and immunogenicity profiles against the reference drug dulaglutide.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: CTR20221721.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glucagon-Like PeptidesHypoglycemic AgentsImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAdultAgedBlood GlucoseChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsBlood GlucosedulaglutideGlucagon-Like PeptidesGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsbiosimilardulaglutideHbA1csafety

Identifiers

PMID40214296
PMCPMC11987204

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.