ReviewJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2025
Advances in colorectal cancer screening and detection: a narrative review on biomarkers, imaging and preventive strategies.
Review in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Model for Predicting Capsular and Neural Invasion in Thyroid Carcinoma: Diagnostic Accuracy Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Screening, Prognostic, and Predictive Molecular Tools for Colorectal Cancer: Recent Advances in the Classical Background.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Clinical relevance and mechanistic investigation of miR-1908-5p as a prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer.Hereditas · 2026Article
- Exosomal microRNAs in colorectal cancer communication networks: implications for metastasis, therapy resistance, and precision medicine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The Multifaceted Role of Annexin A1 in Colorectal Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Predictive and Prognostic Implications.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Clinical significance of ANXA9 expression in colorectal cancer and its impact on immune evasion and drug resistance.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Transcriptome-Wide Analysis and Experimental Validation from FFPE Tissue Identifies Stage-Specific Gene Expression Profiles Differentiating Adenoma, Carcinoma In-Situ and Adenocarcinoma in Colorectal Cancer Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the third incident rate and a second mortality rate, colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to be one of the most prevalent and deadly malignancies worldwide. Adenomas usually develop into adenocarcinomas in colorectal cancer (CRC), a process that can be halted by early detection and prevention care. MAIN BODY: Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and endoscopies are examples of current screening tools that dramatically lower the incidence and death of colorectal cancer. Current development centre on non-invasive methods that provide better accuracy and lower dangers, such as blood-based liquid biopsies and imaging modalities like CT and MR colonography. For early detection, liquid biopsies-especially those using methylated DNA tests like SEPT9-offer encouraging outcomes. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a crucial biomarker, increasing early identification and therapy monitoring. Proteomic and metabolic indicators further improve screening by figuring out who is at high risk and keeping an eye out for recurrence. The accuracy and detection rates of polyps have increased due to advancements in imaging technologies like as artificial intelligence (AI), narrow-band imaging (NBI), and high-definition colonoscopy. The emphasis has been on preventive measures, such as chemoprevention and lifestyle modifications, dietary fibre, regular exercise, and chemoprotective drugs like aspirin have demonstrated potential in lowering the incidence of colorectal cancer. There are still issues with the global implementation of screening, including differences in access to screening between socioeconomic and racial groups. Hope for more individualized and efficient CRC screening and prevention are provided by new research on biomarkers and technological advancements like artificial intelligence and polygenic risk classification.
conclusionWith a variety of invasive and non-invasive techniques available to identify cancer early. With a variety of invasive and non-invasive techniques available to identify cancer early. To enhance prognosis and lower mortality, colorectal cancer screening has undergone tremendous advancement. Although colonoscopy and faecal immunochemical assays (FIT) are still good standards for detecting colorectal cancer (CRC), advances in liquid biopsy, proteomics, and imaging have transformed the field and offered less invasive, more precise choices, for early identification and surveillance, circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) and other biomarkers show tremendous potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.