Evidence mapPaperPMID 40214837Full record

ReviewJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2025

Advances in colorectal cancer screening and detection: a narrative review on biomarkers, imaging and preventive strategies.

Adil Khan, Uswa Hasana, Iman Anum Nadeem, Swara Punit Khatri, Shayan Nawaz, Qurat Ulain Makhdoom, Shahab Wazir, Kirtan Patel, Mohamd Ghaly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adil KhanNowshera Medical College, Nowshera, Pakistan. Dradilkhan17@gmail.com.
Uswa HasanaFatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Iman Anum NadeemUniversity College of Medicine and Dentistry Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Swara Punit KhatriGujarat Cancer Society Hospital and Research Center, Ahmedabad, India.
Shayan NawazUniversity College of Medicine and Dentistry Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Qurat Ulain MakhdoomFatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Shahab WazirNowshera Medical College, Nowshera, Pakistan.
Kirtan PatelGovernment Medical Collegeand , New Civil Hospital, Surat, India.
Mohamd GhalyUniversity of Sharjah, Sharjah City, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the third incident rate and a second mortality rate, colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to be one of the most prevalent and deadly malignancies worldwide. Adenomas usually develop into adenocarcinomas in colorectal cancer (CRC), a process that can be halted by early detection and prevention care. MAIN BODY: Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and endoscopies are examples of current screening tools that dramatically lower the incidence and death of colorectal cancer. Current development centre on non-invasive methods that provide better accuracy and lower dangers, such as blood-based liquid biopsies and imaging modalities like CT and MR colonography. For early detection, liquid biopsies-especially those using methylated DNA tests like SEPT9-offer encouraging outcomes. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a crucial biomarker, increasing early identification and therapy monitoring. Proteomic and metabolic indicators further improve screening by figuring out who is at high risk and keeping an eye out for recurrence. The accuracy and detection rates of polyps have increased due to advancements in imaging technologies like as artificial intelligence (AI), narrow-band imaging (NBI), and high-definition colonoscopy. The emphasis has been on preventive measures, such as chemoprevention and lifestyle modifications, dietary fibre, regular exercise, and chemoprotective drugs like aspirin have demonstrated potential in lowering the incidence of colorectal cancer. There are still issues with the global implementation of screening, including differences in access to screening between socioeconomic and racial groups. Hope for more individualized and efficient CRC screening and prevention are provided by new research on biomarkers and technological advancements like artificial intelligence and polygenic risk classification.

conclusionWith a variety of invasive and non-invasive techniques available to identify cancer early. With a variety of invasive and non-invasive techniques available to identify cancer early. To enhance prognosis and lower mortality, colorectal cancer screening has undergone tremendous advancement. Although colonoscopy and faecal immunochemical assays (FIT) are still good standards for detecting colorectal cancer (CRC), advances in liquid biopsy, proteomics, and imaging have transformed the field and offered less invasive, more precise choices, for early identification and surveillance, circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) and other biomarkers show tremendous potential.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerColonoscopyHumansLiquid BiopsyBiomarkers, TumorColorectal adenomasColorectal cancerColorectal cancer detectionColorectal cancer screening and detectionCRC screening

Identifiers

PMID40214837
PMCPMC13313417

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.