Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40214992›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2025

Interventions for Childhood Central Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Setognal B Aychiluhm, Utpal K Mondal, Vivian Isaac, Allen G Ross, Kedir Y Ahmed

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Heavy moms, wheezy kids: how maternal obesity harms breathing in offspring.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  4. The gut microbiota in malnutrition.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Setognal B AychiluhmRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, New South Wales, Australia.
Utpal K MondalRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, New South Wales, Australia.
Vivian IsaacSchool of Allied Health, Exercise & Sports Sciences, Faculty of Science & Health, Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales, Australia.
Allen G RossRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, New South Wales, Australia.
Kedir Y AhmedRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The rapid rise in childhood central obesity and its cardiometabolic complications in adulthood highlight the urgent need for targeted global interventions. Objective: To examine the association of lifestyle, behavioral, and pharmacological interventions with childhood central obesity. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, CINHAL, PsycINFO, PubMed, Academic Search Database, and ProQuest from inception to September 25, 2024. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria included (1) randomized clinical trials (RCTs) focusing on children aged 5 to 18 years with overweight or obesity at baseline and (2) measured central obesity as a primary or secondary outcome. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline was followed. Two authors independently extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2.0). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to pool standardized mean differences (SMD) from individual studies. Sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses were also conducted. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was childhood central obesity measured using waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio, waist-to-hip ratio, and WC z score. Results: This review included 34 RCTs, involving 8183 children aged 5 to 18 years. Twelve studies had a low risk of bias, whereas 8 were deemed to have a higher risk of bias. The meta-analysis of 2 RCTs examining low-fat lunchboxes and a Mediterranean diet along with physical activity (lasting up to 150 minutes per week over 6 to 9 months) showed a significant association with WC (standard mean difference [SMD], -0.38 [95% CI, -0.58 to -0.19]). Five additional RCTs involved behavioral interventions on dietary education to reduce unhealthy snacks, increase fruit and vegetable intake, promote daily physical activity, and limit screen time, supported by online resources also showed a significant association with WC (SMD, -0.54 [95% CI, -1.06 to -0.03]). However, standalone dietary, physical activity, pharmacotherapy, dietary supplements, motivational interviewing, and combined dietary, physical activity, and behavioral methods did not show a significant association with WC. Conclusions and Relevance: In this meta-analysis of RCTs, combining dietary changes with physical activity, as well as using behavioral strategies alone, were associated with reduced central obesity in children from high- and middle-income countries. Findings from this study have policy implications for Sustainable Development Goals of ending all forms of malnutrition and reducing premature mortality from noncommunicable diseases.

Indexed as

Obesity, AbdominalPediatric ObesityAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolExerciseFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWaist Circumference

Identifiers

PMID40214992
PMCPMC11992610

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.