ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2026
Development and validation of an explainable machine learning prediction model for futile recanalization after mechanical thrombectomy in acute large vessel occlusion stroke.
Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the primary treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the likelihood of futile recanalization (FR) at 90 days post-MT remains high.
methodsThis study included 534 AIS patients with anterior circulation LVO who underwent MT, with the primary outcome being FR. The derivation cohort consisted of 445 patients (June 2018-June 2023), while the temporal validation cohort had 89 patients (July 2023-June 2024). The derivation cohort was split into 70% training and 30% internal validation sets. Eleven machine learning (ML) models were trained, tested, and compared, and the best-performing model was selected for optimization and temporal validation. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for model interpretation.
resultsThe CatBoost model showed the best discriminative ability among the 11 ML models. After feature selection and dimensionality reduction, a final explainable CatBoost model with 12 features was established, accurately predicting FR in both internal (area under the curve (AUC)=0.915) and temporal (AUC=0.930) validations. The model has been deployed as a web application for clinical use.
conclusionWe developed a ML prediction model with 12 key features that demonstrates excellent performance in predicting FR. The deployment of this model as a web application offers a promising tool for clinicians to assess FR risk, potentially enhancing patient selection and improving personalized stroke care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.