Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40216808›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Prevalence and predictors of modern contraceptive method utilization among married couples in the pastoralist communities of Fentale district, Eastern Ethiopia.

Sena Adugna Beyene, Sileshi Garoma, Tefera Belachew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sena Adugna BeyeneInstitute of Health, Department of Population and Family Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. senaada491@gmail.com.
Sileshi GaromaDepartments of Public Health, Adama Hospital Medical College, Adama, Ethiopia.
Tefera BelachewDepartment of Nutrition & Dietetics, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Funding

David and Lucille Packard Foundation [Re. No-Let/021/2021]Jimma University [Ref. No. SGS/2024/2013]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite progress in contraceptive use, Ethiopia faces significant challenges in adopting modern methods, particularly in pastoralist areas. Existing studies predominantly focus on women's family planning (FP) service utilization, often overlooking couple-level outcomes and male perspectives. This study aims to fill this gap by exploring factors affecting modern contraceptive use among couples in the Fentale District of Eastern Ethiopia. This mixed-methods cross-sectional study collected qualitative data from August 1 to September 20, 2021, and quantitative data from October 1 to December 25, 2021. A total of 1496 married couples were sampled using multi-stage systematic sampling. Quantitative data were gathered via semi-structured questionnaires, while qualitative data were obtained from 10 focus group discussions (FGDs), 20 key informant interviews (KIIs), and 30 in-depth interviews (IIDs). Quantitative analysis employed multivariable logistic regression modeling, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically without computer software. Among participants, 46.3% married at age 15 or younger, 53.8% lacked formal education, and 64.6% were nomadic pastoralists. Notably, 94.2% never discussed family planning, and only 27.4% used any form of family planning, with 18.2% opting for modern methods. Short-term methods like pills (13.7%), injectables (5.9%), and male condoms (7.5%) were more prevalent than traditional methods (9.0%) or long-term methods (1.6%). Concerns included a desire for more children (68.7%), religious opposition (63.0%), partner opposition (51.1%), and fear of side effects (42.9%). Early marriage (AOR = 0.613, 95% CI 0.315-1.193) and no formal education (AOR = 2.878, 95% CI 1.976-4.191) decreased contraceptive use odds, while being in business increased odds (AOR = 7.461, 95% CI 3.324-16.748). Mobile phone ownership increased use odds (AOR = 3.628, 95% CI 1.573-8.363), while having a bank account decreased odds (AOR = 0.017, 95% CI 0.006-0.045). Discussing family planning significantly increased contraceptive use odds (AOR = 15.708, 95% CI 2.320-106.369), while desiring more children decreased odds (AOR = 0.406, 95% CI 0.185-0.890). These findings underscore the importance of socio-demographic, socio-economic, reproductive history factors, spousal communication, and male involvement in modern contraceptive use among pastoralist communities. The study reveals unique reproductive challenges faced by pastoralist couples, driven by socio-demographic, socio-economic, reproductive history factors, and cultural beliefs that impact modern contraceptive use. Tailored interventions, including promotion of long-term contraceptive methods, educational campaigns involving religious leaders, and mobile health services, are essential to address limited healthcare access. Engaging both spouses in family planning, promoting male involvement, and fostering joint decision-making through effective communication are crucial for enhancing contraceptive uptake and improving reproductive health outcomes. Collaboration with community members and stakeholders is vital for the success of targeted interventions.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesMarriageAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSpousesSurveys and QuestionnairesCultural beliefsDual protection methodsEducation campaignsIntervention strategiesMale involvementMobile clinicsPastoralist communityReligious beliefsReproductive health outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40216808
PMCPMC11992141

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.