SynthesisNutrition journal2025
The role of cocoa flavanols in modulating peripheral and cerebral microvascular function in healthy individuals and populations at-risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Nutrition journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary flavanols preserve upper- and lower-limb endothelial function during sitting in high- and low-fit young healthy males.The Journal of physiology · 2026Trial
- Beyond Taste: The Impact of Chocolate on Cardiovascular and Steatotic Liver Disease Risk Factors.Nutrients · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCocoa flavanols (CFs) are polyphenolic molecules with proposed cardioprotective effects. Whilst extensive evidence supports their ability to ameliorate vasodilator responses within conduit vessels, their actions in the microvasculature are less clear. This systematic review of the literature aimed to determine whether CF interventions lead to improvements in microvascular vasodilator responses in healthy populations and those with increased cardiovascular disease risk.
methodsDatabase searches were conducted up to September 2023 using Medline, Embase, Pubmed and Web of Science Core Collection to identify randomised, placebo-controlled, human studies investigating the effect of CF interventions on the microvasculature (at rest and vasodilator responses). All studies were assessed for risk of-bias according to Cochrane Collaboration recommendations for randomised-controlled trials, data were extracted from studies and findings collated by vote-counting.
resultsSearches identified 511 unique articles for screening, of which 19 were selected for data extraction. Vasodilator responses were enhanced in 85.7% (80.4-91.0%, p = 0.013) of all acute studies (n = 13), and in 81.8% (74.1-89.4%, p = 0.065) of studies in healthy subgroups (n = 11). Importantly, this effect was apparent in all studies with 'low risk of bias' (n = 8, p = 0.008). In contrast, there was no effect of acute CF interventions at rest. For chronic studies (n = 7), the effect of CFs was less clear, with a significant benefit reported at rest only, in all young, healthy subgroups (n = 7, p = 0.016), but no evidence of improvements in vasodilator responses.
conclusionsCFs have the potential to improve microvascular function, particularly in healthy individuals, with benefits appearing more pronounced following acute CF supplementation. Despite this, interpretations are limited by the small number of comparable studies identified and the heterogeneity of populations studied. Overall, the effects of CFs on the microvasculature seem to be less consistent than previous evidence in the macrovasculature, suggesting that the microvessels may be less susceptible to the effect of CFs than conduit arteries. REGISTRATION: The PROSPERO registration number for this review is CRD42023483814.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.