ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2025
Long-term surveillance of the anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody lecanemab: rights and duties of pharmacovigilance.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Regulatory, clinical, and post-marketing challenges of lecanemab for Alzheimer's disease: insights from real-world data.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Pooled it
- Cardiovascular adverse event reporting profile of tirzepatide: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of heart failure, arrhythmias, and ischemic events.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Recognizing potential immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated optic neuritis: insights from the FDA adverse event reporting system.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Real-world pharmacovigilance for anti-Aβ therapies using a large language model.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody lecanemab received the US accelerated approval for mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia stage of Alzheimer disease in January 2023, which was converted into traditional approval in June 2023. However, its regulatory assessment in Europe is still ongoing, and the European Commission has asked the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of the European Medicines Agency to consider an update on the safety of lecanemab. Thus, timely post-marketing real-life studies are essential to clarify its long-term safety profile and to establish relevant place in therapy. In this regard, a recent study by Xing et al., analyzed individual case safety reports (ICSRs) collected in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), a consolidated pharmacovigilance archive. In this Matters Arising article, we highlighted important methodological aspects that should not be overlooked by clinicians who are not fully familiar with this kind of study (the so-called disproportionality analysis through the case/non-case design), thus supporting enhanced awareness of stakeholders on interpretation, limitations and opportunities of FAERS data. To this end, we focused on the unexpected signal of pancreatic carcinoma raised by Xing et al., attempted to replicate the statistical findings and also provided a descriptive inspection of ICSRs: these are current rights and duties of modern pharmacovigilance to ensure evidence-based decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.