ReviewActa epileptologica2024
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke epilepsy: a mini-review.
Review in Acta epileptologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) is a common complication of stroke, significantly impacting patient's quality of life. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an emerging potential non-invasive treatment for PSE. This review explores current evidence for rTMS in PSE, highlighting its potential benefits and limitations. Initial studies suggested that rTMS may reduce the seizure burden. Some studies observed a trend towards fewer seizures within two weeks of treatment initiation, indicating a relatively rapid response. Additionally, rTMS may be more effective when used in combination with medication, particularly for patients with specific lesion locations (frontal/temporal lobes) and seizure types (complex partial seizures). This points towards the potential of personalized treatment protocols. However, current evidence has limitations. Studies often involve small sample sizes and methodological variations, necessitating larger, well-designed trials with standardized protocols to confirm the efficacy and safety of rTMS in PSE. Future research should also focus on the optimization of treatment parameters, including stimulation frequency, duration, coil placement, and treatment course. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the persistence of treatment effects on seizure control, cognitive function, and overall patient outcomes. Refining patient selection criteria and investigating the underlying mechanisms of therapeutic effects of rTMS in PSE are also crucial areas for future exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.