ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Male Hormonal Contraception-Current Stage of Knowledge.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why male contraception still stalls: translational, social, and ethical gaps.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Progestins - a review of clinical application in gynecology.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Male hormonal contraception has been the focus of extensive research efforts aimed at identifying effective and reversible methods for male fertility control. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge, key achievements, and future directions in the development of male hormonal contraception. A review was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. The search strategy included terms such as "male hormonal contraception", "Nestorone", "7α,11β-Dimethyl-19-nortestosterone 17β-undecanoate (DMAU)" and "11β-methyl-19-nortestosterone 17β-dodecylcarbonate (11β-MNTDC)". A total of 107 references were analyzed to synthesize the most relevant findings regarding the hormonal contraceptive agents under investigation. The review outlines historical and recent advancements in male hormonal contraception, highlighting compounds that have demonstrated limitations in effectiveness, side effects, or inconvenient administration. Notable candidates under study include 7α-methyl-19-nortestosterone (MENT), DMAU, 11β-MNTDC, and the combination of segesterone acetate with testosterone in gel form. These agents show promise due to their ability to suppress follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH), leading to effective spermatogenesis inhibition with minimal side effects. Additionally, the phenomenon of spermatogenic rebound is considered. Among the investigated agents, oral DMAU, 11β-MNTDC, and the Nestorone-testosterone gel appear to be the most promising candidates for male hormonal contraception due to their high efficacy, user-friendly administration, and favorable safety profiles. However, further large-scale clinical trials are necessary to confirm their long-term effects on human health and fertility, ensuring their viability as future contraceptive options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.