Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217755›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Management of SARS-CoV-2 Infection-Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Polish Association of Epidemiologists and Infectiologists, for 2025.

Robert Flisiak, Jerzy Jaroszewicz, Dorota Kozielewicz, Ernest Kuchar, Miłosz Parczewski, Małgorzata Pawłowska, Anna Piekarska, Piotr Rzymski, Krzysztof Simon, Krzysztof Tomasiewicz and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Robert FlisiakDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University in Białystok, 15-540 Białystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3394-1635
Jerzy JaroszewiczDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Silesia, 40-635 Katowice, Poland.
Dorota KozielewiczDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4651-6443
Ernest KucharPediatric and Observation Department, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7883-2427
Miłosz ParczewskiDepartment of Infectious and Tropical Diseases and Acquired Immunodeficiency, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.
Małgorzata PawłowskaDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6044-0425
Anna PiekarskaDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Łódź, 90-419 Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7188-4881
Piotr RzymskiDepartment of Environmental Medicine, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4713-0801
Krzysztof SimonDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Wrocław, 51-149 Wrocław, Poland.
Krzysztof TomasiewiczDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland.
Dorota Zarębska-MichalukDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Allergology, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-317 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0938-1084

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first Polish recommendations for the management of COVID-19 were published by the Polish Society of Epidemiologists and Infectiologists (PTEiLChZ) on 31 March 2020, and the last three years ago. The emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants, a different course of the disease, as well as new knowledge about therapies and vaccines, requires updating diagnostic, therapeutic, and prophylactic guidelines. Despite the reduction in the threat associated with COVID-19, there is a risk of another epidemic caused by coronaviruses, which was an additional reason for developing a new version of the guidelines. In preparing these recommendations, the Delphi method was used, reaching a consensus after three survey cycles. Compared to the 2022 version, the names of the individual stages of the disease have been changed, adapting them to the realities of clinical practice, and attention was paid to the differences observed in immunosuppressed patients and in children. Some previously recommended drugs have been discontinued, including monoclonal antibodies. In addition, general principles of vaccination were presented, as well as issues related to the post-COVID syndrome.

Indexed as

COVID-19diagnosticspreventionSARS-CoV-2therapy

Identifiers

PMID40217755
PMCPMC11989246

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.