Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217892›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Precision Psychiatry for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Clinical Applications of Deep Learning Architectures.

Brian A Zaboski, Lora Bednarek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Quo Vadis translational neuroscience?Translational neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian A ZaboskiYale School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4567-8694
Lora BednarekDepartment of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2214-7858

Funding

Brain and Behavior Foundation (NARSAD) 31149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a complex psychiatric condition characterized by significant heterogeneity in symptomatology and treatment response. Advances in neuroimaging, EEG, and other multimodal datasets have created opportunities to identify biomarkers and predict outcomes, yet traditional statistical methods often fall short in analyzing such high-dimensional data. Deep learning (DL) offers powerful tools for addressing these challenges by leveraging architectures capable of classification, prediction, and data generation. This brief review provides an overview of five key DL architectures-feedforward neural networks, convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, generative adversarial networks, and transformers-and their applications in OCD research and clinical practice. We highlight how these models have been used to identify the neural predictors of treatment response, diagnose and classify OCD, and advance precision psychiatry. We conclude by discussing the clinical implementation of DL, summarizing its advances and promises in OCD, and underscoring key challenges for the field.

Indexed as

biomarkersdeep learningmachine learningneural networksobsessive-compulsive disorderprecision psychiatry

Identifiers

PMID40217892
PMCPMC11989962

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.