ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Omics in Keratoconus: From Molecular to Clinical Practice.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Celastrol nanomedicine eye drops restore redox homeostasis and prevents keratoconus progression via PI3K/AKT/AP-1 signaling.Redox biology · 2026Article
- The Genetic and Epigenetic Architecture of Keratoconus: Emerging Pathways and Clinical Implications.Genes · 2026Review
- The Future of Interventional Keratoconus Management: Perspectives on Integrating Epithelium-on Oxygen-Enriched Cross-Linking into Comprehensive Care Pathways.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Article
- Tear MicroRNA-Based Molecular Signature for Keratoconus Stratification: A Cross-Cohort Integration Study.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2026Article
- Exploring Molecular and Clinical Dimensions of Glaucoma as a Neurodegenerative Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keratoconus (KC) is a progressive ocular disorder marked by structural and functional alterations of the cornea, leading to significant visual impairment. Recent studies indicate that these corneal changes are linked to molecular and cellular mechanisms that disrupt and degrade the extracellular matrix. This degradation is influenced by proteinases that contribute to a loss of homeostasis and an imbalance in the antioxidant/oxidative state within the cornea, fostering oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis. Although these biological processes have been identified primarily through molecular biology research, omics technologies have significantly advanced our understanding of the physiological and pathological phenomena associated with KC. Omics studies encompassing genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics, and metabolomics, have emerged as critical tools in elucidating the complex biological landscape of various diseases, including ocular conditions. The integrative application of these studies has demonstrated their potential in personalizing medicine across diverse fields such as oncology, neurology, and ophthalmology. This review aims to describe findings from omics research applied to keratoconus, highlighting the genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, epigenomic, and metabolomic aspects derived from ocular and other biological samples. Notably, the molecular insights gained from these studies hold promise for identifying biomarkers of keratoconus, which could enhance diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic strategies. The exploration of these biomarkers may facilitate improved management and treatment options for patients, contributing to personalized care in keratoconus management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.