Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217936›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Ocular Side Effects of Dupilumab: A Comprehensive Overview of the Literature.

Giacomo Boscia, Federico Spataro, Vanessa Desantis, Antonio Giovanni Solimando, Angelo Vacca, Roberto Ria, Alfonso Savastano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giacomo BosciaDepartment of Translational Biomedicine Neuroscience, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8768-899X
Federico SpataroGuido Baccelli Unit of Internal Medicine, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Vanessa DesantisSection of Pharmacology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), School of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1942-2601
Antonio Giovanni SolimandoGuido Baccelli Unit of Internal Medicine, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), School of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2293-9698
Angelo VaccaGuido Baccelli Unit of Internal Medicine, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), School of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4567-8216
Roberto RiaGuido Baccelli Unit of Internal Medicine, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), School of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1515-0090
Alfonso SavastanoSchool of Medicine, Libera Università Mediterranea Degennaro, 70010 Casamassima, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin (IL)-4 receptor alpha subunit and IL-13, has markedly advanced the treatment of atopic conditions such as dermatitis, asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis. However, its expanding use has brought increased attention to a range of ocular adverse events-conjunctivitis, blepharitis, keratitis, corneal ulcers, and cicatricial conjunctivitis-that remain underrecognized and frequently underestimated in clinical practice. These manifestations often emerge in patients with atopic dermatitis and display varying severity, posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Rather than isolated phenomena, these effects appear to stem from a complex interplay of goblet cell depletion, mucin deficiency, immune dysregulation, and microbiome alterations, including Demodex proliferation. Current management strategies remain largely empirical, lacking standardized protocols, and are often guided by anecdotal evidence. In this review, we critically appraise the existing literature, synthesize emerging pathogenic hypotheses, and highlight the unmet clinical need for evidence-based treatment algorithms. We advocate for a multidisciplinary approach and future research aimed at elucidating mechanisms, refining risk stratification, and minimizing ocular toxicity without compromising the therapeutic benefits of dupilumab. Furthermore, we intend to provide a more practical and straightforward resource for the reader based on the current literature on approaching the topic.

Indexed as

blepharitisconjunctivitisdupilumabdupilumab complicationskeratitisocular inflammation

Identifiers

PMID40217936
PMCPMC11989250

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.