Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40218366›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Chains of Commerce: A Comprehensive Review of Animal Welfare Impacts in the International Wildlife Trade.

Helen Lambert, Angie Elwin, Délagnon Assou, Mark Auliya, Lauren A Harrington, Alice C Hughes, Aniruddha Mookerjee, Tom Moorhouse, Gohar A Petrossian, Evan Sun and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Wildlife Trade and Genetic Basis of Disease Susceptibility: A Review.International journal of immunogenetics · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Using customs data to understand overlooked trade in non-CITES birds between Africa and Asia.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Helen LambertAnimal Welfare Consultancy, Newton Abbot TQ12 3BW, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1530-0033
Angie ElwinWorld Animal Protection, 222 Greys Inn Road, London WC1X 8HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8583-3295
Délagnon AssouLaboratory of Ecology and Ecotoxicology (LaEE), University of Lomé, Lomé 01 BP 1515, Togo.ORCID 0000-0002-1593-1452
Mark AuliyaZoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig of the Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Lauren A HarringtonWildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Tubney House, Tubney OX13 5QL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7212-2336
Alice C HughesSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Aniruddha MookerjeeIndependent Researcher, 11/4 Baherakhar, Malajkhand, Balaghat 481116, India.
Tom MoorhouseOxford Wildlife Research, 64 Charles Street, Oxford OX4 3AS, UK.
Gohar A PetrossianJohn Jay College of Criminal Justice, 524 West 59th Street, New York, NY 10019, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0708-2833
Evan SunWorld Animal Protection, 222 Greys Inn Road, London WC1X 8HB, UK.
Clifford WarwickEmergent Disease Foundation, 71-75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9JQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8299-6096
Özgün Emre CanDepartment of Biology, Ankara University, Dögol Street, Ankara 06100, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6283-5386
Neil D'CruzeWorld Animal Protection, 222 Greys Inn Road, London WC1X 8HB, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The commercial wildlife trade involves billions of animals each year, consumed for various purposes, including food, fashion, entertainment, traditional medicine, and pets. The experiences of the animals involved vary widely, with negative welfare states being commonplace. To highlight the broad scope of animal welfare impacts across the commercial wildlife trade, we present ten case studies featuring a range of species traded globally for different purposes: (1) Ball pythons captured and farmed to serve as pets; (2) Zebrafish captive bred to serve as pets; (3) African Grey Parrots taken from the wild for the pet industry; (4) Sharks de-finned for traditional medicine; (5) Pangolins hunted for traditional medicine; (6) Crickets farmed for food and feed; (7) Frogs wild-caught for the frog-leg trade; (8) Crocodilians killed for their skins; (9) Lions farmed and killed for tourism; and (10) Elephants held captive for tourism. The case studies demonstrate that wild animals commercially traded can suffer from negative welfare states ranging from chronic stress and depression to frustration and extreme hunger. The individuals involved range from hundreds to billions, and their suffering can last a lifetime. Given the welfare issues identified and the growing recognition and scientific evidence for animal sentience, we propose reducing and redirecting consumer demand for these consumptive wildlife practices that negatively impact animals.

Indexed as

animal sentienceanimal welfarebehaviour change initiativesdemand redirectionwildlife trade

Identifiers

PMID40218366
PMCPMC11988014

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.