Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40218429›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

A Novel Approach to Engaging Communities Through the Use of Human Behaviour Change Models to Improve Companion Animal Welfare and Reduce Relinquishment.

Natalie Powdrill-Wells, Chris Bennett, Fiona Cooke, Suzanne Rogers, Jo White

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalie Powdrill-WellsWoodgreen Pets Charity, Kings Bush Farm, London Road, Godmanchester PE29 2NH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2814-7042
Chris BennettWoodgreen Pets Charity, Kings Bush Farm, London Road, Godmanchester PE29 2NH, UK.ORCID 0009-0002-5931-3397
Fiona CookeWoodgreen Pets Charity, Kings Bush Farm, London Road, Godmanchester PE29 2NH, UK.
Suzanne RogersHuman Behaviour Change for Life CIC, Norwich NR9 4DE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1798-1082
Jo WhiteHuman Behaviour Change for Life CIC, Norwich NR9 4DE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experts consider tackling companion animal ownership problems, such as delayed veterinary treatment and a lack of appropriate care provision, to be key in striving towards improved animal welfare. Additionally, every year, millions of companion animals are relinquished to rescue centres globally; a process that can be distressing for both people and animals. By adapting traditional shelter model activity, it is possible to develop proactive community interventions to provide support for companion animal owners prior to crisis points and therefore, prevent suffering. This case report shares a novel approach to improving companion animal welfare and reducing avoidable relinquishment in communities. As part of a three-stage process, a mixed-method approach was applied to build an understanding of the needs of owners of potentially vulnerable companion animals in the target community. The research stages revealed that the lack of timely veterinary treatment for pets within the target community represented a welfare concern. Based upon this understanding, a co-creation approach was deployed to design targeted interventions to improve companion animal welfare in the community through the application of human behaviour change theories. The process revealed the operational effectiveness of a co-creation approach to intervention design in the context of improving animal welfare. This novel approach has demonstrated significant value in addressing the needs of pet-owning communities.

Indexed as

animal welfareco-creationcommunityhuman behaviour changeintervention designrelinquishment

Identifiers

PMID40218429
PMCPMC11987725

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.