ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Investigation and Validation of New Heart Rate Measurement Sites for Wearable Technologies.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A recent focus has been on developing wearable health solutions that allow users to seamlessly track their health metrics during their daily activities, providing convenient and continuous access to vital physiological data. This work investigates a heart rate (HR) monitoring system and compares the HR measurement from two potential sites for foot wearable technologies. The proposed system used a commercially available photoplethysmography sensor (PPG), microcontroller, Bluetooth module, and mobile phone application. HR measurements were obtained from two anatomical sites, i.e., the dorsalis pedis artery (DPA) and the posterior tibial artery (PTA), and compared to readings from the Apple Smartwatch during standing and walking tasks. The system was validated on twenty healthy volunteers, employing ANOVA and Bland-Altman analysis to assess the accuracy and consistency of the HR measurements. During the standing test, the Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 0.08 bpm for the DPA compared to a smaller mean difference of 0.069 bpm for the PTA. On the other hand, the walking test showed a mean difference of 0.255 bpm and -0.06 bpm for the DPA and PTA, respectively. These results showed a high level of agreement between the HR measurements collected at the foot with the smartwatch measurements, with superiority for the HR measurements collected at the PTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.