ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Noninvasive Glucose Measurements in Tissue Simulating Phantoms Using a Solid-State Near-Infrared Sensor.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optical Biosensors and Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Benchmark data are reported for a solid-state laser-based near-infrared spectrometer designed for noninvasive measurements in human skin. These data were obtained using a set of aqueous phantoms composed of polystyrene beads, triton X-100, saline, and glucose. The performance of this prototype solid-state laser platform was compared to parallel results obtained with a Fourier-transform (FT) spectrometer. The fundamental spectroscopic performances of the two spectrometer systems were quantified by an analysis of 100% lines determined by ratioing back-to-back spectra collected over time for each phantom. Root mean square (RMS) noise levels were computed for each dataset and the median RMS noise levels were 327.8 µAU and 667.2 µAU for the FT spectrometer and prototype laser platform, respectively. The analytical utility of the solid-state laser platform was assessed through a series of leave-one-phantom-out partial least squares analyses. Results for the laser prototype data included a standard error of cross validation (SECV) of 7.82 mg/dL for an optimized PLS model with 10 factors over a spectral range of 1401-2238 nm. This compares favorably with the results from the FT spectrometer of an SECV of 6.62 mg/dL with 8 factors and a spectral range of 1551-2378 nm. The additional two PLS factors for the laser prototype were shown to be a consequence of its higher spectral noise. Selectivity of these PLS models was demonstrated by comparing models associated with correct and random glucose assignments to each spectrum. Overall, these findings benchmark the analytical utility of this solid-state laser prototype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.