Evidence mapPaperPMID 40218973Full record

ReviewNutrients2025

Ultraprocessed Foods and Neuropsychiatric Outcomes: Putative Mechanisms.

Mariane Lutz, Marcelo Arancibia, Javier Moran-Kneer, Marcia Manterola

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mariane LutzCenter for Translational Studies in Stress and Mental Health (C-ESTRES), Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2360102, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6665-6748
Marcelo ArancibiaCenter for Translational Studies in Stress and Mental Health (C-ESTRES), Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2360102, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-2239-6248
Javier Moran-KneerCenter for Translational Studies in Stress and Mental Health (C-ESTRES), Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2360102, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-2633-3167
Marcia ManterolaCenter for Translational Studies in Stress and Mental Health (C-ESTRES), Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2360102, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-5802-1301

Funding

C-ESTRES (Center for Translational Studies in Stress and Mental Health), Universidad de Valpa-raíso, Chile CIDI 003/2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A body of evidence indicates an association between ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) and health outcomes. Most of it has been obtained through preclinical studies, although a number of observational studies substantiate how a high intake of these products increases the risk of neuropsychiatric disorders, and an increasing amount of dietary intervention studies confirm these findings. The aim of this narrative review is to describe some of the putative mechanisms involved in the deleterious effects of a high intake of UPFs on neuropsychiatric outcomes. A myriad of unhealthy actions may be associated with the consumption of UPFs, and some mechanisms are being discussed. They include UPFs' high caloric density; their high sugar, sodium, and additives content and low amounts of fiber; and a high palatability that induces overconsumption, acting as obesogens. Moreover, thermal treatment of these foods generates oxidative products such as glycotoxins, lipotoxins, and acrolein, all of which affect the brain. The chemical products act, directly or indirectly, on the gut microbiome and affect the gut-brain axis, causing neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration. UPFs also exert various epigenetic effects that affect mental health and might explain the intergenerational inheritance of neuropsychiatric disorders. A diet containing a high proportion of these foods has a low nutritional density, including bioactive protective agents such as antioxidant and anti-inflammatory compounds that promote eubiosis. The evidence shows that UPFs intake affects neuropsychiatric outcomes such as neurodegeneration, cognitive decline, dementia, and mood disorders and reinforces the need to promote a healthy dietary pattern throughout all life stages, thus interfering with the current commercial determinants of health.

Indexed as

DietFast FoodsFood HandlingMental DisordersGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansOxidative Stressdietary patternsmental healthneurodegenerationneuropsychiatric conditionsultraprocessed foods

Identifiers

PMID40218973
PMCPMC11990412

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.