ReviewPolymers2025
Investigation into the Synthetic Strategies of Melamine-Based Porous Polymeric Materials: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent years have seen the rapid development of melamine-based porous organic polymers, a new category of porous material. This review paper comprehensively describes the progress and trends of melamine-based porous organic polymers by using bibliometric analysis. A total of 1397 publications published over the previous 15 years were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Also, cooperation between countries and affiliations and keyword co-occurrence were assessed with the aid of VOS viewer software 1.6.20. The findings suggested that this field of study is now rapidly evolving. From 41 articles in 2009 to 180 articles in 2022, the number of published articles has increased significantly. China was the most productive nation, publishing 863 articles with 61.78% contribution. The Chinese Academy of Sciences was the most productive organization, and Chinese author Qiang Li was the most productive individual. Keyword co-occurrence analysis identified major research hotspots, including the design of high-surface-area materials for adsorption, functionalization strategies to enhance materials' performance, and novel synthesis routes for structural control. Furthermore, this review systematically categorizes synthetic strategies based on the linkage structures between melamine and other building blocks, providing insights into state-of-the-art advancements and future research directions in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.