ReviewMycoses2025
Antifungal Resistance in Non-fumigatus Aspergillus Species.
Review in Mycoses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiological Characteristics of ClinicalJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CYP51C Y319H and H349R substitutions cannot confer azole resistance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Article
- Prevalence ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Opportunistic fungi in tropical beaches: Diversity, WHO fungal priority pathogens, and antifungal resistance case study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- BeyondAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Efficacy assessments of EL219, a next-generation polyene antifungal, in immunosuppressed mice infected with drug-sensitive and drug-resistantAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- DisseminatedFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Identification ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review provides an in-depth exploration of antifungal resistance in non-fumigatus Aspergillus species, mainly focusing on acquired resistance. The available data have been compiled and sometimes re-analysed. It highlights the increasing prevalence of resistance in non-fumigatus species belonging to Flavi, Terrei, Nigri, and Nidulantes Aspergillus sections, offering a detailed analysis of resistance detection methods and the global distribution of resistant strains. The review also thoroughly examines the molecular mechanisms behind resistance and raises key unresolved issues, such as the factors contributing to resistance selection and the clinical implications of in vitro resistance. Additionally, it addresses the challenges of treating infections caused by resistant Aspergillus species and cryptic species and discusses current and future strategies relying on combination therapy and newly developed antifungals. The conclusion emphasises the need for further research into resistance mechanisms and alternative treatments to address the rising threat of antifungal resistance in Aspergillus species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.