ArticleStress (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Repeated presentation of visual threats drives innate fear habituation and is modulated by threat history and acute stress exposure.
Article in Stress (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tail-rattling in rodents: more than a threat display.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Optogenetic stimulation of Purkinje cells in the cerebellar vermis disrupts innate freezing behaviors and is highly aversive.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Sex-specific exploration accounts for differences in valence learning in male and female mice.eLife · 2025Article
- Extinction and subsequent updating of innate fear responses to a visual looming stimulus rely on hippocampus-dependent mechanisms.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Adolescent male and female rats show enhanced latent inhibition of conditioned fear compared to adult rats.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To survive predation, animals must be able to detect and appropriately respond to predator threats in their environment. Such defensive behaviors are thought to utilize hard-wired neural circuits for threat detection, sensorimotor integration, and execution of ethologically-relevant behaviors. Despite being hard-wired, defensive behaviors (i.e. fear responses) are not fixed, but rather show remarkable flexibility, suggesting that extrinsic factors such as threat history, environmental contexts, and physiological state may alter innate defensive behavioral responses. The goal of the present study was to examine how extrinsic and intrinsic factors influence innate defensive behaviors in response to visual threats. In the absence of a protective shelter, our results indicate that mice showed robust freezing behavior following both looming (proximal) and sweeping (distal) threats, with increased behavioral vigor in response to looming stimuli, which represent a higher threat imminence. Repeated presentation of looming or sweeping stimuli at short inter-trial intervals resulted in robust habituation of freezing, which was accelerated at longer inter-trial intervals, regardless of contextual cues. Finally, prior stress history such as acute foot shock further disrupted innate freezing habituation, resulting in a delayed habituation phenotype, consistent with a heightened fear state. Together, our results indicate that extrinsic factors such as threat history, environmental familiarity, and stressors have robust and diverse effects on defensive behaviors, highlighting the behavioral flexibility in how mice respond to predator threats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.