ReviewArchives of dermatological research2025
A review on recent advances and challenges of microneedle technology for enhanced topical treatment of skin disorders.
Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- mRNA Therapeutics for Skin Rejuvenation: From Aging Atlases to Clinical Translation.Experimental dermatology · 2026Review
- Advances in 3D Printed Microneedles as a Prototype for Skin Targeted Therapeutics in Personalized Dermal Pharmaceuticals.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Review
- Bioinspired wearable polymer microneedle patches: pioneering diabetic wound therapy for the horizon.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Polymeric 3D-Printed Microneedle Arrays for Non-Transdermal Drug Delivery and Diagnostics.Polymers · 2025Review
- Chemical peeling in combination with microneedling versus chemical peeling or microneedling monotherapy in the treatment of acne scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microneedles are tiny, minimally invasive needles that are made to create microchannels over a subcutaneous layer of the skin. These micro-injuries encourage the secretion of growth factors and prompt collagen synthesis. The reasons for using microneedling therapy have increased significantly, leading to its widespread adoption in dermatology. This review article discussed recent advances and challenges of microneedle technology for enhanced topical treatment of skin disorders. It discussed the effective and safe use of microneedles for treating different types of skin conditions like acne, scars, alopecia, melasma, skin rejuvenation, and photo-damage. The drug delivery through the skin was enhanced and rare or permanent adverse effects were not mentioned, while temporary redness and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation were frequently seen. Microneedling seems to be a generally reliable and secure treatment choice for various skin conditions. More extensive and randomized clinical trials were necessary to ensure their safety and efficacy across diverse populations, conditions, and treatment durations. This trial helps to identify optimal dosages, long-term outcomes, and any adverse effects that may not appear in smaller studies. They also enable comparisons with existing therapies, ensuring the technology's generalizability and value. Moreover, such trials are essential for regulatory approval and to determine which microneedle technologies work best for specific uses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40220134What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.