ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of risk factors for diabetes in Chinese middle-aged and elderly adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two-Time-Point Inflammatory Status Patterns and the Risk of Incident Diabetes: A Cohort Study Based on CHARLS.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multidimensional drivers of diabetes prevalence among middle-aged and elderly in China: from a geographical perspective.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify and analyze the factors associated with the prevalence of diabetes among Chinese adults, using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Data from the CHARLS cohort, with a mean age of 63.3 years, were analyzed using SPSS software. Descriptive statistics were performed for the overall population, as well as urban and rural subgroups. Logistic regression models were employed to assess the association between diabetes and variables such as age, gender, smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, and mental health disorders. Paired-sample t-tests were conducted to evaluate changes in diabetes prevalence across 2015, 2018, and 2020. The average of diabetes increased from 1.08 in 2015 to 1.15 in 2020, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001). Paired-sample t-tests showed significant differences between 2020 and 2018, as well as between 2018 and 2015 (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis identified hypertension (aOR = 0.447, 95% CI: 0.410-0.488, P < 0.001) and chronic disease (aOR = 0.024, 95% CI: 0.013-0.042, P < 0.001) as key risk factors for diabetes. Mild physical exercise was a protective factor (aOR = 0.813, 95% CI: 0.708-0.935, P < 0.01), while smoking (aOR = 1.220, 95% CI: 1.088-1.369, P < 0.001) and alcohol consumption (aOR = 1.125, 95% CI: 1.020-1.242, P < 0.05) increased the risk. Smoking and alcohol had a greater impact in urban areas, while hypertension and mental health disorders were more influential in rural areas. This study demonstrates that age, gender, smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, and mental disorders significantly influence the risk of diabetes among Chinese adults aged 45 and above. Distinct risk factors were identified between urban and rural populations, highlighting the necessity for tailored intervention strategies. The longitudinal analysis from 2015 to 2020 revealed a substantial increase in diabetes prevalence, underscoring the critical need for sustained and targeted public health efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.