Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40222178›Full record

ArticleArhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju2025

Knowledge and perceptions of ionising radiation among Croatian general practitioners: is there cause for concern?

Andro Matković, Thomas Ferenc, Lucija Dimjašević, Martin Drinković, Marko Marelić, Branka R Matković, Vinko Vidjak, Jelena Popić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andro MatkovićMerkur University Hospital, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Thomas FerencMerkur University Hospital, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4917-9270
Lucija DimjaševićMerkur University Hospital, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Martin DrinkovićPolyclinic Drinković, Department of Radiology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Marko MarelićUniversity of Zagreb School of Medicine, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Branka R MatkovićUniversity of Zagreb Faculty of Kinesiology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Vinko VidjakMerkur University Hospital, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Jelena PopićUniversity of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent data suggest that general practitioners (GPs) are insufficiently familiar with health risks associated with ionising radiation and radiation doses. The aim of our cross-sectional study was therefore to see if this holds true for Croatian GPs. To do that, we distributed a questionnaire about ionising radiation and doses used in various radiological procedures by email or by handing it out to participants at a national GP conference. We received responses from 120 participating GPs. Most were women (83.1 %), and the mean participant age was 44.2 years (range 26-65) with mean practice of 17.1 years (range 1-40). Most participants (97 %) believed patients should be informed about the procedures they were referred to. All respondents knew that radiological procedures irradiate the patient's body, but not everyone agreed that they could be harmful. Less than half (47 %) thought that exposure to a single irradiation dose was enough to increase cancer risk. Most participants (89.2 %) identified X-ray scans as the largest irradiation source, whereas three GPs replied that computed tomography (CT) and conventional X-ray procedures did not involve radiation. Some respondents did not know if ultrasound involved ionising radiation. Although most GPs were women, only 21.7 % correctly identified the radiation dose in mammography. Our findings confirm inadequate GPs' knowledge of radiation exposures and call for better training programmes as part of continuing professional development.

Indexed as

General PractitionersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRadiation, IonizingAdultAgedCroatiaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiation DosageSurveys and Questionnairescontinuing professional developmentCTdoze zračenjaGPirradiation dosesliječnici obiteljske medicinemammographymamografijaradiological proceduresradiološki postupciRTGtrajno medicinsko usavršavanjeultrasoundultrazvukX-ray

Identifiers

PMID40222178
PMCPMC11994234

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.