Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40222448›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2025

Exploring the acute and chronic effects of a multistrain probiotic supplement on cognitive function and mood in healthy older adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Jessica Eastwood, Saskia van Hemert, Maria Stolaki, Claire Williams, Gemma Walton, Daniel Lamport

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04951687 (The Acute and Chronic Effects of Ecologic Barrier© on Mood and Cognition), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04951687 nacompletednot on this map

The Acute and Chronic Effects of Ecologic Barrier© on Mood and Cognition

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ReadingRan2021 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsCognitive Change, MoodArmsEcologic Barrier©, Placebo powder
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica EastwoodSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jessica.eastwood@reading.ac.uk.
Saskia van HemertWinclove Probiotics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maria StolakiWinclove Probiotics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Claire WilliamsSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
Gemma WaltonFood Microbial Sciences Unit, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
Daniel LamportSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAging is associated with a decline in cognitive function and vulnerability to depression. Probiotic supplements have shown beneficial effects on cognition and mood in clinical populations, but the potential benefit for healthy older adults experiencing age-related decline in cognition remains unclear.

objectivesThe primary aim of the present work was to explore the effect of a chronic (long-term) multispecies probiotic intervention on cognition in healthy aging adults. Secondary aims included exploring the chronic effect on mood outcomes and gut microbiota community, as well as a novel investigation into the acute effect of supplementation on cognition and mood.

methodsThe study employed a randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial in 30 healthy older adults to explore the acute (1 d) and chronic (8 wk) effects of a probiotic supplement on cognitive domains of memory and executive function, alongside mood measures of stress, anxiety, depression, and cognitive reactivity to sad mood. 16s rRNA sequencing of stool samples was also performed pre- and postchronic intervention to assess potential effects on the gut microbiota.

resultsAcute probiotic supplementation was associated with faster reaction times on cognitively demanding trials during a task of executive function [-64.91 ms, 95% confidence interval (CI): -115.70, -14.15]. Chronic supplementation was associated with improvement in cognitive biases such as hopelessness (-0.97, 95% CI: -1.72, -0.23), rumination (-1.58, 95% CI: -2.86, -0.29), and aggression (-1.57, 95% CI: -2.63, -0.51) that contribute to reactivity to sad mood and therefore vulnerability to depression, and may improve executive function under higher cognitive demand (0.43%, 95% CI: -0.53%, 1.38%).

conclusionsThe current work provides novel evidence for an acute effect of probiotics on reaction times during executive function, which should be replicated in future work. Additionally, this work replicates previous findings of improved cognitive reactivity to sad mood following chronic probiotic supplementation, indicating probiotics may reduce risk of developing depression in a healthy aging population. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04951687.

Indexed as

AffectCognitionDietary SupplementsProbioticsAgedCross-Over StudiesExecutive FunctionFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMaleMiddle Agedagingcognitive functiongut–brain axismoodprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID40222448
PMCPMC12226749

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.