Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40222991›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Clinicopathological characterization of non-guttata corneal endothelial dystrophy in Saudi patients with idiopathic endothelial failure.

Hind M Alkatan, Abdullah M Aljenaidel, Azza My Maktabi, Mohammed M Abusayf, Abdullah M Alfawaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hind M AlkatanDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. hindkatan@yahoo.com.
Abdullah M AljenaidelCornea and Anterior Segment Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Azza My MaktabiPathology & Laboratory Medicine Department, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed M AbusayfDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah M AlfawazDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal endothelial cell dysfunction is a common cause of corneal decompensation in elderly. We describe a non-guttata corneal endothelial dystrophy with correlation of the clinical features to the histopathological and ultrastructural characteristics in a cohort of Saudi patients. A retrospective study of all consecutive cases of primary corneal decompensation in phakic eyes due to endothelial attenuation, in the absence of guttata is conducted. Patients were treated by either penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) or Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) as a primary procedure between 2002 and 2016. Clinical and demographic data were obtained through chart review and the histopathological data were collected by reviewing Descemet's membrane (DM) in the corneal tissue samples of the affected eyes. We included 17 eyes from 17 patients (10 females and 7 males), with a mean age of 67.17 ± 8.98 years. All patients were phakic, and decreased vision was the patients' main complaint at presentation. The pre-operative endothelial cell count was obtained in 3 eyes with a mean of 531.7 ± 309.5/mm

Indexed as

Endothelium, CornealAgedDescemet MembraneDescemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyFemaleHumansKeratoplasty, PenetratingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSaudi ArabiaCorneal decompensationCorneal edemaDescemet’s membraneEndothelial dystrophyFuch’s dystrophyNon-guttataPseudoexfoliation

Identifiers

PMID40222991
PMCPMC11994752

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.