ArticleiScience2025
Automated comprehensive evaluation of coronary artery plaque in IVOCT using deep learning.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The process of manually characterizing and quantifying coronary artery plaque tissue in intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) images is both time-consuming and subjective. We have developed a deep learning-based semantic segmentation model (EDA-UNet) designed specifically for characterizing and quantifying coronary artery plaque tissue in IVOCT images. IVOCT images from two centers were utilized as the internal dataset for model training and internal testing. Images from another independent center employing IVOCT were used for external testing. The Dice coefficients for fibrous plaque, calcified plaque, and lipid plaque in external tests were 0.8282, 0.7408, and 0.7052 respectively. The model demonstrated strong correlation and consistency with the ground truth in the quantitative analysis of calcification scores and the identification of thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA). The median duration for each callback analysis was 18 s. EDA-UNet model serves as an efficient and accurate technological tool for plaque characterization and quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.