SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
Olaparib monotherapy or combination therapy in lung cancer: an updated systematic review and meta- analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib Combined With Cediranib in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- MOB2 Loss Sensitizes Lung Cancer Cells to PARP Inhibition Through p53-Dependent DNA Damage Signaling.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Impaired double strand DNA repair by homologous repair deficiency (HRD) leads to sensitivity to poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibition. A subset of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) harbour impaired DNA double strand break repair. This study aims to investigate meta-analysis on the olaparib monotherapy or combination therapy in lung cancer. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in Pubmed, Scopus and Google Scholar data bases up to August 13, 2023 related articles were extracted title, abstract and full text of articles were screened. The quality included articles were assessing the data was extracted and hence analysis. Results: After screening 5208 articles, 9 were selected for final review based on relevance to the topic. Olaparib monotherapy increased progression free survival (PFS) level [ES= 7.76; 95% CI= 0.16 to 1.36; P=0.208]. Olaparib maintenance therapy increased PFS compared to placebo in platinum-sensitive NSCLC patients [ES= 0.9; 95% CI= 0.9 to 0.9]. Combination therapy with durvalumab and olaparib decreased PFS level compared to the olaparib group [ES=6.07; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.67 to 11.46; P=0.000]. Adding gefitinib to olaparib decreased PFS compared to olaparib only group, significantly (ES=3.39; 95% CI=-0.78 to 7.56; P=0.609). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated olaparib as monotherapy can increase the PFS of patients with lung cancer, but the combination of olaparib and gefitinib or the combination of olaparib plus durvalumab couldn't have a significant effect. According to the high heterogeneous rate of studies further large-scale randomized control trials are still required to progress association. Systematic Review Registration: Open Science Framework (OSF).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.