ReviewMediastinum (Hong Kong, China)2025
Practical value of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in treatment strategies for thymic epithelial tumors: implications for more specific use in routine clinical practice.
Review in Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atypical type A thymoma: a narrative review of a distinct and progressive variant of low-risk thymoma.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2026Review
- The Value of Baseline [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Narrative review of the prognostic significance of primary tumor size in thymic epithelial tumor.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many studies have demonstrated that 18-fluorine fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is useful for predicting the grade of malignancy of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), and there is a close relationship between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumor stage. However, more specific usage of FDG-PET for TETs has not been proposed, and the actual value of FDG-PET in routine clinical practice should be firmly clarified. In this review, following three cutoff values of SUVmax that may be helpful in determining treatment strategies in cases of anterior mediastinal masses, particularly presented as discrete and resectable lesions, are identified: (I) SUVmax of 7.5 as an indicator for pretreatment biopsy: differential diagnosis between TETs and mediastinal lymphoma (ML); (II) SUVmax of 4.2 as an indicator for a minimally invasive approach (MIA): differentiation of noninvasive TETs and invasive TETs; and (III) SUVmax of 5.9 as a reference value for the necessity of lymph node dissection (LND). There are still several challenges in using FDG-PET for routine clinical practice that need to be addressed, such as variations between instruments and institutions, leading to lower reproducibility. Harmonization methods should be applied to make clinical practice more uniform. Due to the rarity of these diseases, multi-institutional studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.