ArticleOphthalmology science
Autonomous Screening for Diabetic Macular Edema Using Deep Learning Processing of Retinal Images.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MultiRetNet: A Lightweight Explainable AI Approach to Diabetic Retinopathy Grading and DME Detection Using Fundus-OCT Fusion.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Selecting measures of visual function to classify diabetic retinopathy status: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2026Article
- A lightweight DeepME model based on improved YOLOv11 architecture for macular edema detection and treatment monitoring.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a deep learning model for diabetic macular edema (DME) detection using color fundus imaging, which is applicable in a diverse, multidevice clinical setting. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. Subjects: A deep learning model was trained for DME detection using the EyePACS dataset, consisting of 32 049 images from 15 892 patients. The average age was 55.02%, and 51% of the patients were women. Methods: Data were randomly assigned, by participant, into development (n = 14 246) and validation (n = 1583) sets. Analysis was conducted on the single image, eye, and patient levels. Model performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Independent validation was further performed on the Indian Diabetic Retinopathy Image Dataset, as well as on new data. Main Outcome Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. Results: At the image level, a sensitivity of 0.889 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.878, 0.900), a specificity of 0.889 (95% CI: 0.877, 0.900), and an AUC of 0.954 (95% CI: 0.949, 0.959) were achieved. At the eye level, a sensitivity of 0.905 (95% CI: 0.890, 0.920), a specificity of 0.902 (95% CI: 0.890, 0.913), and an AUC of 0.964 (95% CI: 0.958, 0.969) were achieved. At the patient level, a sensitivity of 0.900 (95% CI: 0.879, 0.917), a specificity of 0.900 (95% CI: 0.883, 0.911), and an AUC of 0.962 (95% CI: 0.955, 0.968) were achieved. Conclusions: Diabetic macular edema can be detected from color fundus imaging with high performance on all analysis metrics. Automatic DME detection may simplify screening, leading to more encompassing screening for diabetic patients. Further prospective studies are necessary. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.