ArticleAJPM focus2025
The Underutilization of National Diabetes Prevention Program Among Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: An In-Depth Focus Group Analysis.
Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus significantly increases the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. However, the National Diabetes Prevention Program, effective in reducing Type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence, is underutilized among women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. This study aims to explore the factors contributing to this underutilization and propose strategies to increase National Diabetes Prevention Program's usage. Methods: A qualitative study with narrative methodology was employed, involving focus group discussions with 18 women aged between 29 and 43 years, who had a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Participants were recruited from a gestational diabetes mellitus registry through University of California, San Diego's online platform. The discussions were aimed at understanding their awareness of Type 2 diabetes mellitus risk after gestational diabetes mellitus and their knowledge about the National Diabetes Prevention Program. Results: Thematic analysis of the discussions revealed 4 key themes: (1) challenges in navigating health information after gestational diabetes mellitus; (2) perceived facilitators for National Diabetes Prevention Program participation, including peer support, personalized guidance, and virtual options; (3) perceived barriers, such as time constraints, childcare responsibilities, and financial considerations; and (4) insights into patient perspectives on gestational diabetes mellitus care. Despite awareness of their increased Type 2 diabetes mellitus risk, there was a notable gap in knowledge about the National Diabetes Prevention Program among participants. Conclusions: The study highlights the critical need for improved communication regarding postgestational diabetes mellitus risk of type 2 diabetes and the National Diabetes Prevention Program. Addressing communication gaps, offering personalized support, and accommodating the unique challenges faced by women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus can enhance National Diabetes Prevention Program participation. The significance of a patient-centric approach in diabetes prevention is underscored, emphasizing that such an approach could significantly impact Type 2 diabetes mellitus prevention in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.