Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40226301›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational radiation oncology2025

Brachytherapy: Perspectives for combined treatments with immunotherapy.

Raphaël Serre, Alexandra Gabro, Mickael Andraud, Jean-Marc Simon, Jean-Philippe Spano, Philippe Maingon, Cyrus Chargari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Breakthroughs in modern brachytherapy are transforming cancer care.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raphaël SerreRadiation Oncology Department, La Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris.Sorbonne University, France.
Alexandra GabroRadiation Oncology Department, La Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris.Sorbonne University, France.
Mickael AndraudRadiation Oncology Department, La Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris.Sorbonne University, France.
Jean-Marc SimonRadiation Oncology Department, La Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris.Sorbonne University, France.
Jean-Philippe SpanoMedical Oncology Department, La Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris.Sorbonne University, France.
Philippe MaingonRadiation Oncology Department, La Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris.Sorbonne University, France.
Cyrus ChargariRadiation Oncology Department, La Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris.Sorbonne University, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining brachytherapy with immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), is a promising approach for potentiating both local control of the tumor and fully exploiting the synergies between pharmaceutic immunomodulation and radiotherapy. Compared to other radiotherapy techniques, BT has a potential to better spare lymphatic drainage areas and gut microbiota, thus reducing the immunosuppressive effects of radiation therapy. In addition, it delivers a broad range of doses due to inherent dose inhomogeneity within the implanted volume. This variability increases the probability that immune infiltrates would be activated, particularly since the optimal dose for immune activation is not yet firmly established. Even if preclinical models show that radiotherapy can stimulate immune responses, it can also induce toxic effects on immune effectors and combination trials show conflicting outcomes. There is a need for refining radiation modalities to enhance immune potentiation. The dosimetric specificities of BT may offer various advantages and should be explored further. Scarce clinical data on combining brachytherapy with ICIs in advanced cancer suggest potential benefits, with case reports of complete local responses and abscopal effects. However, validation requires a large number of patients in randomized clinical trials for which ideal design is discussed. In parallel with ongoing clinical developments, there is a need to refine preclinical models in order to better analyze the specific biological effects involved in BT, in light of immunomodulatory systemic treatments.

Indexed as

Abscopal effectsBrachytherapyCervical cancerCheck point inhibitorsImmunotherapyRadiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID40226301
PMCPMC11992541

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.