Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40226417›Full record

SynthesisJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2023

Mapping the Landscape of Magnetic Field Effects on Neural Regeneration and Repair: A Combined Systematic Review, Mathematical Model, and Meta-Analysis.

Meghan McGraw, Gabrielle Gilmer, Juliana Bergmann, Vishnu Seshan, Kai Wang, David Pekker, Michel Modo, Fabrisia Ambrosio

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Meghan McGraw *Discovery Center for Musculoskeletal Recovery, Schoen Adams Research Institute at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Gabrielle Gilmer *Discovery Center for Musculoskeletal Recovery, Schoen Adams Research Institute at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9039-4183
Juliana BergmannDiscovery Center for Musculoskeletal Recovery, Schoen Adams Research Institute at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-6523-3174
Vishnu SeshanInstitute of Quantum Science and Technology, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Kai WangDiscovery Center for Musculoskeletal Recovery, Schoen Adams Research Institute at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8447-6177
David PekkerDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5873-0028
Michel ModoMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4436-735X
Fabrisia AmbrosioDiscovery Center for Musculoskeletal Recovery, Schoen Adams Research Institute at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5497-5968

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic field exposure is a well-established diagnostic tool. However, its use as a therapeutic in regenerative medicine is relatively new. To better understand how magnetic fields affect neural repair

Indexed as

Magnetic FieldsModels, BiologicalNerve RegenerationAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationHumansNeural Stem Cells

Identifiers

PMID40226417
PMCPMC11918650

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.