Evidence mapPaperPMID 40227008Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

What Are the Experiences, Views and Perceptions of Patients, Carers and Clinicians of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs)? A Scoping Review.

Sam Febrey, Michael Nunns, Jill Buckland, Rebecca Abbott, Alison Bethel, Rebecca Whear, Kate Boddy, G J Melendez-Torres, Jo Thompson Coon, Liz Shaw

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sam FebreyIsca Evidence, University of Exeter Medical School, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Exeter, St Lukes Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4944-664X
Michael NunnsIsca Evidence, University of Exeter Medical School, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Exeter, St Lukes Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5500-0911
Jill BucklandIsca Evidence, University of Exeter Medical School, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Exeter, St Lukes Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK.ORCID 0009-0009-1533-6862
Rebecca AbbottIsca Evidence, University of Exeter Medical School, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Exeter, St Lukes Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4165-4484
Alison BethelIsca Evidence, University of Exeter Medical School, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Exeter, St Lukes Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK.
Rebecca WhearIsca Evidence, University of Exeter Medical School, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Exeter, St Lukes Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8379-8198
Kate BoddyIsca Evidence, University of Exeter Medical School, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Exeter, St Lukes Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9135-5488
G J Melendez-TorresIsca Evidence, University of Exeter Medical School, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Exeter, St Lukes Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9823-4790
Jo Thompson CoonIsca Evidence, University of Exeter Medical School, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Exeter, St Lukes Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5161-0234
Liz ShawIsca Evidence, University of Exeter Medical School, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Exeter, St Lukes Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6092-5019

Funding

This study was supported NIHR Evidence Synthesis Programme (NIHR153420).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are a pharmacological treatment option for both diabetes and weight loss. Qualitative evidence is vital in providing greater understanding of patients, practitioners and carers experience of taking or delivering GLP-1 RAs. This evidence can inform the current or future configuration and delivery of services. We conducted a scoping review to better understand the quantity, nature and key characteristics of qualitative primary evidence which explores the experiences, views and perceptions of patients, carers and clinicians regarding the use of GLP-1 RAs.

methodsFour bibliographic databases were searched on 10 July 2024: MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo via Ovid, CINAHL Ultimate via EBSCOhost, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global via ProQuest. We also searched Google Scholar, two clinical trials registries, the pre-print server medRxiv and conducted citation searches. We sought qualitative research about the experiences of patients, carers and practitioners about any aspect of taking or prescribing GLP-1RAs, for any indication. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. The included studies were collated, and their characteristics were described.

resultsAfter de-duplication 1545 titles and abstracts were screened for relevance, with 77 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, resulting in 25 included studies. More studies were focused on type 2 diabetes (n = 12) than weight loss (n = 9) or any indication (n = 4). The experiences of carers were not represented. No one area of experience (e.g. different indications or viewpoints) was well represented, either due to the absence or narrow focus of studies or lack of an in-depth analytical approach.

conclusionWhilst primary qualitative evidence exploring patient and clinician experience of GLP-1 RAs was identified in this scoping review, the findings highlight a need for more robust qualitative research to be conducted across all user groups, in particular involving carers, and especially for the indication of weight loss within service settings. This evidence gap needs to be urgently addressed to ensure GLP-1 RAs are appropriately prescribed and patients and carers receive support from services suited to their needs. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Seventeen public collaborators contributed to the search by suggesting additional search terms, helping define the population for inclusion and contributing to protocol development. Their thoughts on the findings of the review helped form the basis for the discussion of this paper.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCaregiversGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsPatientsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansQualitative ResearchGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonistsdiabetesglucagon‐Like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs)obesityqualitativescoping reviewweight loss

Identifiers

PMID40227008
PMCPMC11995417

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.