ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Muscle length influences active joint position sense at the shoulder, but conditioning contractions do not.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Active shoulder joint position sense (JPS) is more accurate at higher angles of humerothoracic elevation. During active JPS testing, the extensor/antagonist muscles of the shoulder undergo repeated passive lengthening and do not contract to bring about shoulder extension. This may alter muscle spindle sensitivity at different angles of humeral elevation leading to angle related reduction in repositioning error. The purpose of this study is to examine active shoulder JPS when shoulder extensor muscles when were exposed to either a low-level contraction or full range of motion movement in an active angle reproduction JPS protocol. Fifteen participants completed the study. Participants completed the shoulder JPS protocol using three target angles (30°, 60°, and 90°) under three conditions: standard, range of motion exposure (fROM) between trials, and antagonist contraction (aCON) between trials. There was a significant interaction between conditions and angles (p = 0.002). JPS error decreased at higher elevations in the standard condition (p = 0.014) and aCON conditions (p = 0.035). The effect was absent in the fROM condition, where error across all target angles was consistent with the higher error at 30°. The outcomes suggest that change in the antagonist's muscle length and muscle spindle slackness are significant contributors to shoulder JPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40227442What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.