Evidence mapPaperPMID 40227526Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025

What do users in a polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) forum think about the treatments they tried: Analysing treatment sentiment using machine learning.

Rebecca H K Emanuel, Paul D Docherty, Helen Lunt, Rebecca E Campbell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca H K EmanuelDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3701-1048
Paul D DochertyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. paul.docherty@canterbury.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1661-2573
Helen LuntDiabetes Services, Health New Zealand, Canterbury, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0069-7402
Rebecca E CampbellSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Physiology, Centre for Neuroendocrinology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0309-532X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogenous condition that is estimated to effect up to 21% of reproductive aged people with ovaries. In previous work, a dataset of PCOS features was derived from approximately 100,000 PCOS subreddit users via machine learning. In this study, an exploration of treatment response within the PCOS subreddit was undertaken with the derived dataset. The treatment or symptom features in the dataset had sentiment labels indicating when a treatment was perceived to improve or worsen a condition or symptom. When different features were mentioned within two sentences of each other without conflicting sentiment, it could be assumed that they were related. This assumption allowed for a broad analysis of the perceived effect of popular treatments on the most frequently mentioned symptoms. In general, lifestyle changes and supplements were the most positively regarded, while contraceptives were frequently associated with considerable negative sentiment. For PCOS weight loss, unspecified dieting (RR 5.19, 95% CI 3.28-8.19, n = 99) and intermittent fasting (RR 33.50, 95% CI 8.54-131.34, n = 69) were the most successful interventions. Inositol was associated with a large range of favourable outcomes and was one of the few treatments associated with improved mental health [depression (RR 4.25, 95% CI 1.72-10.51, n = 21), anxiety (RR 5.83, 95% CI 2.76-12.35, n = 41) and mood issues (RR 25.00, 95% CI 3.65-171.10, n = 26)]. Combined oral contraceptive pills as a whole were strongly associated with adverse effects such as worsening depression (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.25, n = 33), anxiety (RR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03-0.36, n = 23), fatigue (RR 0, n = 45) and low libido (RR 0.03, 95% CI 0.01-0.24, n = 30). However, combined contraceptives with anti-androgenic progestins were associated with more favourable experiences. This study demonstrates the utility of machine learning to derive measurable patient experience data from an internet forum. While patient experience data derived using machine learning is not a substitute for traditional clinical trials, it is useful for mass validation and hypothesis generation. This paper may serve as the first exploration into this category of clinical internet forum research.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPolycystic Ovary SyndromeAdultFemaleHumansLife StyleEndocrinologyInternet researchMachine learningPCOS

Identifiers

PMID40227526
PMCPMC12209044

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.