ArticleCurrent cardiology reports2025
Cardiovascular Outcomes After Acute Coronary Syndrome in Persons Living with HIV: A Scoping Review.
Article in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewOver the past twenty-five years, a growing body of research has investigated outcomes after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event in persons with HIV (PWH). In this scoping review, we assessed the published literature on outcomes after a prior ACS event in PWH compared to persons without HIV (PWoH) in the US and Europe. RECENT
findingsOf 27 studies of secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, 15 studies found a greater incidence of recurrent ACS, heart failure, in-stent thrombosis, revascularization, restenosis, and mortality in PWH after a prior ACS event compared to PWoH. PWH were more likely to present with STEMI, less likely to receive percutaneous coronary intervention, and more likely to exhibit an active inflammatory state. The remaining 12 studies found no significant difference in outcomes after a prior ACS event. PWH may face an increased risk of adverse outcomes after ACS that differ in presentation and management compared with PWoH. Larger observational studies are needed to assess outcomes after a prior ACS event in PWH compared to PWoH and improve clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.