ArticleCancers2025
Prognostic Value of SOX2 and NANOG Expression in Recurrent Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Mechanisms in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Integrative Roles of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts, Immune Microenvironment, and Precision Therapeutic Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Expression of p53, Ki-67, sox-2, oct-4, and NANOG in the tongue and trachea of Swiss mice exposed to narghile smoke.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma (re-OSCC) poses a serious therapeutic challenge and is linked to poor survival outcomes. SOX2 and NANOG, key transcription factors in cancer stem cell biology, may drive tumor progression and therapy resistance. However, their prognostic value in re-OSCC and their relationship to adjuvant therapy remain unclear.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed a single-center cohort of 94 patients with re-OSCC treated with curative intent via (1) surgery alone, (2) surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), or (3) surgery plus adjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT). Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed from matched primary and recurrent tumors and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for SOX2, and NANOG was quantified using H-scores. Post-recurrence overall survival (prOS) and post-recurrence disease-free survival (prDFS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsSOX2 expression and survival: Elevated SOX2 expression (H-score > 14) in re-OSCC was significantly associated with improved prOS (
conclusionSOX2 overexpression in re-OSCC correlates with better survival, suggesting a unique prognostic role distinct from primary disease. Adjuvant therapy, especially RCT, appears to maintain or elevate SOX2 levels, potentially contributing to improved treatment response. In contrast, although NANOG expression decreases in recurrence, particularly in patients who undergo surgery alone, it does not significantly affect survival outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of context-specific biomarker assessments and provide a rationale for incorporating SOX2 status into personalized treatment strategies for re-OSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.