ArticleJAMA network open2025
Balancing Efficiency and Equity in Population-Wide CKD Screening.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Read Sequencing in CKD Diagnostics: Breaking Genomic Barriers and Expanding Global Inclusion.Kidney international reports · 2026Review
- ERA's ABCDE framework for kidney disease prevention: turning the WHO kidney health resolution into action.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2026Article
- Screening for Chronic Kidney Disease by Mobile Health Unit Outreach.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- SGLT2 inhibitors and bone health in CKD.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Reducing CKD burden in Europe: first make the elephant apparent!Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: In the era of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, population-wide screening for chronic kidney disease (CKD) may provide good value, yet implications across racial and ethnic groups are unknown. Objective: To evaluate the health outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness of population-wide CKD screening for 4 racial and ethnic groups. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cost-effectiveness analysis, a decision-analytic Markov model was separately calibrated to simulate CKD progression among simulated cohorts of US Hispanic adults, non-Hispanic Black adults, non-Hispanic White adults, and adults who belong to additional racial and ethnic groups (ie, Asian and multiracial individuals and those self-reporting other race and ethnicity). Effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors was derived from the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease trial. Mortality, quality-of-life weights, and cost estimates were obtained from published cohort studies, randomized clinical trials, and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data. Analyses were conducted from January 1, 2023, to November 6, 2024. Exposures: One-time or periodic (every 10 or 5 years) screening for albuminuria, initiated between age 35 and 75 years, with and without addition of SGLT2 inhibitors to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker therapy for CKD. Main Outcomes and Measures: Lifetime cumulative incidence of kidney failure requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT); discounted life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), lifetime health care costs (in 2024 US dollars), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Results: Under the status quo, non-Hispanic Black adults aged 35 years had the highest lifetime incidence of kidney failure requiring KRT (6.2% [95% UI, 2.8%-10.6%]) compared with Hispanic adults (3.6% [95% UI, 1.1%-6.7%]), non-Hispanic White adults (2.3% [95% UI, 0.4%-5.2%]), and adults from additional racial and ethnic groups (3.3% [95% UI, 1.2%-6.5%]). Screening every 5 years from ages 55 to 75 years combined with SGLT2 inhibitors reduced incidence of KRT and increased LYs across all racial and ethnic groups, with the largest average changes observed for non-Hispanic Black adults (0.8-percentage point decrease and 0.19-year increase). Every 5-year screening from age 55 to 75 years cost $99 100/QALY gained for the overall population and less than $150 000/QALY gained across racial and ethnic groups, with the lowest cost observed for non-Hispanic Black adults ($73 400/QALY gained). Screening starting at age 35 years was only cost-effective for non-Hispanic Black adults ($115 000/QALY gained). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cost-effectiveness analysis, population-wide screening for CKD from ages 55 to 75 years was projected to improve population health, was cost-effective, and reduced disparities across 4 racial and ethnic groups. Starting population-wide screening at younger ages was projected to further benefit non-Hispanic Black adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.