Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40228497›Full record

SynthesisObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2025

Impact of food, beverage, and alcohol brand marketing on consumptive behaviors and health in children and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Emma Boyland, Nicholas Davies, Moon Wilton, Andrew Jones, Michelle Maden, Ffion Curtis, Rebecca Evans, Amy Finlay, Lauren McGale, Caroline Cerny and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Impact of food, beverage, and alcohol brand marketing on consumptive behaviors and health in children and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Are wePublic health nutrition · 2026
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Emma BoylandDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Nicholas DaviesDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Moon WiltonDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4052-7918
Andrew JonesLiverpool John Moore's University, Liverpool, UK.
Michelle MadenLiverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ffion CurtisLiverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Rebecca EvansDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Amy FinlayDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Lauren McGaleEdge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Caroline CernyBite Back 2030, London, UK.
Nika PajdaBite Back 2030, London, UK.
Abigail K RoseLiverpool John Moore's University, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Research England
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to unhealthy food, beverage, and alcohol marketing can contribute to inadequate diet and excess alcohol consumption, both risk factors for diet-related non-communicable diseases including obesity and cancer. By not featuring specific products, brand-only marketing strategies circumvent restrictions that assess healthiness at the product level and restrict accordingly. Currently, there is no global or national government policy that explicitly addresses brand marketing for unhealthy products linked to diet-related non-communicable diseases. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes contemporary evidence on the effects of food, beverage, and alcohol brand-marketing on diet-related cognitive outcomes (preference, choice), diet-related behavioral outcomes (purchase requests, purchase, consumption), and health-related outcomes (body weight, body mass index, obesity) in children and adults. Included studies manipulated acute marketing exposure, with at least one brand-only marketing condition. Fourteen databases were searched (including MEDLINE and PubMed) for articles published from January 2004 to February 2024. Nineteen eligible studies were identified and assessed for bias; five were included in the meta-analysis assessing effects on consumption. Findings from the review suggest brand marketing for food, beverages, and alcohol can influence preference, choice, and purchase intent. The meta-analysis found no evidence of a significant effect of brand-only marketing on consumption. Overall, evidence was limited and of mixed quality so further robust research is needed to inform regulatory action. Government policies for reducing brand-only marketing are needed to protect vulnerable populations from brand marketing promoting unhealthy consumption behaviors that increase the risk of non-communicable disease.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesBeveragesFoodMarketingAdultChildHumansObesityalcoholbeveragebrandfoodmarketingmeta‐analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40228497
PMCPMC12318912

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.