Evidence mapPaperPMID 40228796Full record

ReviewNursing & health sciences2025

Shared Decision-Making in Choosing Dialysis Modalities for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis.

Youn-Jung Son, Jeehee Han, Eun Young Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nursing & health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Youn-Jung SonRed Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0961-9606
Jeehee HanRed Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8330-9828
Eun Young KimDepartment of Nursing, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0150-7287

Funding

Soonchunhyang University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of shared decision-making, which respects the autonomy of patients with chronic kidney disease in the process of choosing dialysis modalities, has been emphasized. Studies clearly defining the process of selecting dialysis methods for chronic kidney disease patients remain limited. Thus, this study aimed to conduct a Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis of shared decision-making in choosing dialysis modalities among patients with chronic kidney disease. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using data from six electronic databases from 2013 to 2024. In total, 36 papers were included in this analysis. We found the seven key attributes of shared decision-making in dialysis modalities: "Setting goals for treatment sustainability and life after treatment," "Building a trusting and respectful relationship," "Developing a collaborative partnership," "Effective patient-doctor communication," "Choosing the right dialysis treatment options," "Making personalized and informed decisions" and "Voluntary participation and interactive process." Our knowledge can promote patient-centered communication and contribute to the development of tailored interventions for patients with chronic kidney disease and their family caregivers.

trial registration(PROSPERO) CRD42023453585 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).

Indexed as

Concept FormationDecision Making, SharedRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicDecision MakingHumansPatient Participationchronic kidney diseaseconcept analysisnursesrenal failureshared decision‐making

Identifiers

PMID40228796
PMCPMC11996271

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.