ReviewGenome research2025
The impact of long-read sequencing on human population-scale genomics.
Review in Genome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building and applying pangenome references to capture genetic diversity.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- From variants to answers: The evolution of genetic counseling in IEI.Journal of human immunity · 2026Review
- Recent advances in understanding the spectrum of genetic determinants of lipoprotein(a) levels.Current opinion in lipidology · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-read sequencing technologies, particularly those from Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore Technologies, are revolutionizing genome research by providing high-resolution insights into complex and repetitive regions of the human genome that were previously inaccessible. These advances have been particularly enabling for the comprehensive detection of genomic structural variants (SVs), which is critical for linking genotype to phenotype in population-scale and rare disease studies, as well as in cancer. Recent developments in sequencing throughput and computational methods, such as pangenome graphs and haplotype-resolved assemblies, are paving the way for the future inclusion of long-read sequencing in clinical cohort studies and disease diagnostics. DNA methylation signals directly obtained from long reads enhance the utility of single-molecule long-read sequencing technologies by enabling molecular phenotypes to be interpreted, and by allowing the identification of the parent of origin of de novo mutations. Despite this recent progress, challenges remain in scaling long-read technologies to large populations due to cost, computational complexity, and the lack of tools to facilitate the efficient interpretation of SVs in graphs. This perspective provides a succinct review on the current state of long-read sequencing in genomics by highlighting its transformative potential and key hurdles, and emphasizing future opportunities for advancing the understanding of human genetic diversity and diseases through population-scale long-read analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.