ArticleGut microbes2025
Metagenomic source tracking after microbiota transplant therapy.
Article in Gut microbes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fecal microbiota transplantation in chronic liver disease: Current and future state of the art.Hepatology communications · 2026Review
- A review of engraftment assessments following fecal microbiota transplant.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- The challenges and opportunities in the expanding horizons of microbiota transplant therapies.Gut microbes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable engraftment assessment of donor microbial communities and individual strains is an essential component of characterizing the pharmacokinetics of microbiota transplant therapies (MTTs). Recent methods for measuring donor engraftment use whole-genome sequencing and reference databases or metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) to track individual bacterial strains but lack the ability to disambiguate DNA that matches both donor and patient microbiota. Here, we describe a new, cost-efficient analytic pipeline, MAGEnTa, which compares post-MTT samples to a database comprised MAGs derived directly from donor and pre-treatment metagenomic data, without relying on an external database. The pipeline uses Bayesian statistics to determine the likely sources of ambiguous reads that align with both the donor and pre-treatment samples. MAGEnTa recovers engrafted strains with minimal type II error in a simulated dataset and is robust to shallow sequencing depths in a downsampled dataset. Applying MAGEnTa to a dataset from a recent MTT clinical trial for ulcerative colitis, we found the results to be consistent with 16S rRNA gene SourceTracker analysis but with added MAG-level specificity. MAGEnTa is a powerful tool to study community and strain engraftment dynamics in the development of MTT-based treatments that can be integrated into frameworks for functional and taxonomic analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.