Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40229272›Full record

Trial reportNature communications2025

Neo-adjuvant pembrolizumab in stage IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer: the phase II Neo-Pembro trial.

S L Aronson, B Thijssen, M Lopez-Yurda, S N Koole, P van der Leest, A León-Castillo, R Harkes, I M Seignette, J Sanders, M Alkemade and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03126812 (Feasibility Study of Neo-adjuvant Treatment With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel and Pembrolizumab in Primary Stage IV Serous Ovarian Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03126812 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Feasibility Study of Neo-adjuvant Treatment With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel and Pembrolizumab in Primary Stage IV Serous Ovarian Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteRan2017 to 2024Enrolled33ConditionsOvarian Cancer Stage IV, Peritoneal Cancer, Fallopian Tube CancerArmsCarboplatin, Paclitaxel, Pembrolizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Advances in immunotherapies in ovarian cancer.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

S L AronsonDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7262-1015
B ThijssenDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1562-2649
M Lopez-YurdaDepartment of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3678-3222
S N KooleDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
P van der LeestDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8527-4956
A León-CastilloDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R HarkesDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
I M SeignetteDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7757-698X
J SandersDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0551-7813
M AlkemadeCore Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
I KemperDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M J HoltkampDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
I A M MandjesDepartment of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
A BroeksCore Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M J LahayeDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M A RijlaarsdamDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
D van den BroekDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
L F A WesselsDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1656-6995
H M HorlingsDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4782-8828
W J van DrielCenter for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2246-1994
G S SonkeDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. g.sonke@nki.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8088-9628

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, their efficacy in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) remains limited. Some patients, however, achieve lasting responses, emphasizing the need to understand how tumor microenvironment and molecular characteristics influence ICI response. The phase 2 Neo-Pembro study (NCT03126812) included 33 untreated stage IV HGSOC patients, who were scheduled for 6 cycles of carboplatin-paclitaxel and interval cytoreductive surgery. Pembrolizumab (pembro) was added from cycle two and continued for one year. The primary objective was to assess intratumoral immune activation using multiplexed immunofluorescence and immune-related gene expression. Our findings show immune activation, evidenced by an increase in CD3 + , CD8 + , CD8 + /FOXP3+ ratio, TNF-α and interferon-γ signaling. Treatment was well-tolerated. We observed major pathologic responses in 9/33 patients (27%, 95%CI 14-46), with pathologic response strongly associated with immune activation and OS. At a median follow-up of 52.8 months, 8/9 major responders were alive, with 6 patients recurrence-free. In contrast, 4/24 minor responders survived, including one recurrence-free. ctDNA clearance was observed in all major responders and was associated with prolonged PFS and OS. PD-L1 expression and homologous recombination deficiency were predictive of major response and may serve as biomarkers, warranting further exploration. These results suggest major responders may benefit from neo-adjuvant pembro.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCystadenocarcinoma, SerousOvarian NeoplasmsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPaclitaxelTumor MicroenvironmentAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCarboplatinImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPaclitaxelpembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID40229272
PMCPMC11997049

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.